Re: AR copyright as an FAQ


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by james on May 15, 2003 at 00:19:41 from 81.86.183.229 user jwelson.

In Reply to: Re: AR copyright as an FAQ posted by andy bolger on May 14, 2003 at 19:54:22:

Hear Hear Andy.

Just to add my own thoughts

I agree questions that have straight factual answers, or a general consensus of opinion provides an answer, should be included in an FAQ, but part of the attraction of lurking ( and occassionally participating ) on this site is the way that currently new ideas and suggestions can be aired freely for discussion. I would not like to see all questions and comments referred directly to the archives or FAQ - even if it is felt that they have been answered before. As alot of the areas that are discussed are peoples own opinions and not pure fact it is very difficult to provide a succint answer in an FAQ and the board, I feel, should always open to posts starting with a "what if....."

I also agree that the content on this site should be suggested to the webmasters for this reason and would like to thank them for allowing free discussion re 'All things Ransome', and not dictating what "the answers are"



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Courtesy of Environmental Science, Lancaster

space