Re: dowsing still in use


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by John Nichols on February 20, 2005 at 21:47:20 from 165.91.196.86 user Mcneacail.

In Reply to: Re: dowsing still in use posted by John Nichols on February 20, 2005 at 21:14:12:

It is self evident that Set 4 is a subset of Set 3.

The thing we are looking at is "Are all the people in the set of all humans call it Set H all contained in Set 3?"

Sets 1 and 2 are mutually exclusive but may each be the null set N sets. Set 3 and 4 are not the null set from the proof of the second hypothesis. Sets 1+2+3 = Set H

Finally if Set 1 and Set 2 are null sets N then Set 3 = Set H and Andy B is entirely correct.

But that does not stop me having fun with this:

Thanks Andy for the peer review - keep it up old chap - so to speak.

Of course I am not implying that Andy B is a member of the old chaps set - merely using an idiomatic expression taught to me by my mother.

JMN


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Courtesy of Environmental Science, Lancaster

space