Re: Objects

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by Peter R on March 01, 2005 at 08:48:28 from 62.64.236.142 user badboy.

In Reply to: Re: Objects posted by Mike Field on March 01, 2005 at 00:39:43:

But to someone who didn't know AR's writings it would be difficult to know what was intended -- which is that those things are to be undertaken in a straightforward, honest, constructive, and no-hidden-agendas fashion.

Thanks Mike.
I believe I know what was intended, that TARS should be run on those terms, I simply wanted a Tar's eye view/interpretation/undertanding of it, for future use, maybe. Does anyone wish to disagree with Mike or post their own interpretation?

Follow Ups:

Re: Objects Jon 03/01/05 (13)
- Bolshevik leanings Laurence Monkhouse 03/01/05 (12)
  - Re: Bolshevik leanings Peter H 03/01/05 (11)
    - Re: Bolshevik leanings Pam Adams 03/04/05 (10)
      - Re: Bolshevik leanings John Nichols 03/04/05 (9)
        
        AR Imperialist double agent andyb 03/05/05 (8)
        
        Re: AR Imperialist double agent Duncan 03/06/05 (7)
        
        Re: AR Imperialist double agent John Nichols 03/07/05 (6)
        
        Memories of lake adventures, was AR Imperialist double agent Ed Kiser 03/07/05 (1)
        
        Re: Memories of lake adventures, was AR Imperialist double agent John Nichols 03/08/05 (0)
        
        Re: AR Imperialist double agent andy b 03/07/05 (3)
        
        Re: AR Imperialist double agent John Nichols 03/08/05 (0)
        
        Re: AR Imperialist double agent Peter H 03/07/05 (1)
        
        Re: AR Imperialist double agent John Nichols 03/08/05 (0)

Post a Followup