Re: Third, no actually second


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by Laurence Monkhouse on November 08, 2005 at 19:58:32 from 80.3.128.6 user Laurence_.

In Reply to: Re: Third, no actually second posted by Alan Hakim on November 08, 2005 at 19:27:28:

I am not arguing. I am simply stating what I do myself.

In SD the Swallows are continually referring to PD. In imaginary time - not I fully accept in real time - PD comes earlier! So on my shelves at least it will remain second.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

or is it time to start a New Thread?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Courtesy of Environmental Science, Lancaster

space