Posted by Lyn on March 24, 2006 at 21:54:53 from 198.45.19.38 user LynMellone.
In Reply to: Ransome expressions, but across the pond...? posted by Ed Kiser on March 24, 2006 at 18:18:36:
"fro" is not exactly equivalent to "from," or at least more commonly meaning "back or backward," so wouldn't AR have needed to use "back and forth" not "to and from"?
Give us a breakout like you did for "cheek": can "to and from" be substituted every time?