Re: Kanchenjunga or Kangchenjunga


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by John on June 27, 2006 at 09:10:30 from 24.250.149.61 user Mcneacail.

In Reply to: Re: Kanchenjunga or Kangchenjunga posted by John on June 27, 2006 at 08:56:15:

Original Point 2
As we all know Ransome used Kanchenjunga. I have always assumed that this was because the mountain was in the news in 1929-31 because of three expeditions which attempted (but failed) to climb it and that this was the most common spelling of the time.

My current comment on OP2.

1. As we all know Ransome used Kanchenjunga.

An undisputed fact.

2. I have always assumed that this was because the mountain was in the news in 1929-31 because of three expeditions which attempted (but failed) to climb it

I think there is moderate agreement that this was AR's intent and reason for using Kanchenjunga.

JMN



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

or is it time to start a New Thread?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Courtesy of Environmental Science, Lancaster

space