Re: John and the football team.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by John Richardson

Although not hopelessly myopic, I could certainly have described myself as a unco-ordinated child.

To Tim's comment therefore, I want to say "Three Million Cheers". It was implicit to my delight in the books as a child that there was almost no mention of team games. Indeed I always regarded John as having momentarily "Let the side down" (groan) in mentioning them at all, even in passing.

There is also remarkably little spite or comments about appearance/ability etc between the children. Unrealistically little perhaps. The nearest we get to it is also in WH: The S&As are pretty snobby at first about the urban D's: they must have looked a hopeless pair: glasses, plaits, newspaper to light fires. But as Nancy, whose whole concept of girl-hoodd is challenged by Dorothea, finally musters herself to say: "There's not anything absolutely wrong with plaits" (QFM - quotation from memory).

This tendency only begins to change in Secret Water, where the much larger cast of children, and the far less developed affection and loyalty between the S&As and the Eeels leads to more realisitc rivalry and tension.

John

P.S. Following on from Phil's comments: Even in the early 80's, and even at my rather unfamous private (not public) school, we still played rugby three times a week. In five years at prep school, I managed one try. So although I may have done better than Dick Callum (who ingruously was best swimmer at school for 'men' under-12), you can see where some of the appeal of S&A lay.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]