Re: Sequels, Prequels etc etc


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by PeterH on August 21, 2006 at 12:07:00 from 86.130.122.156 user Peter_H.

In Reply to: Re: Sequels, Prequels etc etc posted by Jock on August 21, 2006 at 07:07:44:

Prue - What annoys me is that so many feel that only one group needs to prevail

Jock - Absolutely right

But who are the 'so many'? I have never encountered anyone who 'feels that only one group needs to prevail' on the matter of AR sequels. There has always been a tendency on Tarboard to interpret a post which merely expresses personal negative feelings about a topic as some sort of intolerant fatwa. (I suspect the word 'bully' is not all that far away.) For goodness sake - people like me are simply saying that, for us, sequels are of no interest, as they can never be as good as the real AR. That is our choice. We are not trying to prevent (as if we could) anyone from attempting a sequel. As Prue says, no one is forced to read one. Who are these people - the 'many' - who are annoying Prue? Can she provide names?Are they in New Zealand? She may mean the AR Literary Executors - fair enough, but there's only two of them!


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

or is it time to start a New Thread?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Courtesy of Environmental Science, Lancaster

space