Re: Let's hear it for acid !


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by Owen Roberts on August 26, 2006 at 01:15:55 from 195.92.67.75 user OwenRoberts.

In Reply to: Re: Let's hear it for acid ! posted by Joe Windsor on August 25, 2006 at 17:11:46:

I am afraid that I have some difficulty in understanding your both logic and chemistry, Joe. Just to concentrate on the chemistry :-

You wrote "7.0 to 7.4 is regarded as healthy. Below 7 is unhealthy and potentially leads to up to 150 degenerative deseases"
Many medical authorities regard between 6.0 and 7.0 as normal. Don't forget stomach acid is about PH 2.0 before you eat a meal otherwise you would not be able ro commence the primary digestion process.

You wrote "Acid = silliness. Not because I said so - but because science says so."
I havn't come across this phrase before, can you give me a reference please?

You wrote "Oh, I missed a bit. Surely Dick would have known that? Or, certainly. Squashy Hat? "
Dick was probably only about 12. I would probably not have know that at that age, maybe you know some more advanced junior chemists.
If you have read PP recently, you will recall at that stage Squashy Hat was still a rival prospector and Dick certainly would have not asked him especially while Nancy was around.




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

or is it time to start a New Thread?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Courtesy of Environmental Science, Lancaster

space