Re: Why Arctic and not Antarctic ?


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by John Giddy on September 08, 2006 at 21:53:08 from 144.133.64.153 user jgiddy.

In Reply to: Re: Why Arctic and not Antarctic ? posted by Peter Ceresole on September 08, 2006 at 21:03:28:

Nansen achieved a South objective ? I think you may be confusing him with Amundsen ?
Nansen did advise Shackleton, but stayed north of the equator himself, I think.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

or is it time to start a New Thread?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Courtesy of Environmental Science, Lancaster

space