Re: Relevance to AR. was Re: Right to Roam?


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by andyb on April 11, 2007 at 14:56:59 from 194.80.183.1 user beardbiter.

In Reply to: Re: Relevance to AR. was Re: Right to Roam? posted by Peter Hyland on April 11, 2007 at 12:30:50:

Well what do you think AR's moral framework(s) was/were? Not charging for toffee? Easy to praise, especially if you are a toffee taker rather than a toffee giver. If you want a moral framework built on the virtue of hospitality try Thesiger's "Arabian Sands", I think an ethic based on sharing scraps of meat charred on a desert campfire would have appealed to the S & A.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

or is it time to start a New Thread?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Courtesy of Environmental Science, Lancaster

space