Re: Relevance to AR. was Re: Right to Roam?


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by Peter Hyland on April 11, 2007 at 15:38:40 from 86.142.67.247 user Peter_H.

In Reply to: Re: Relevance to AR. was Re: Right to Roam? posted by andyb on April 11, 2007 at 14:56:59:

Andy - to me, one thing AR's moral framework does not involve is cynicism about making some toffee for a group of kids. I rather lose interest when people say they are going to 'muddy the waters' of an argument (why?), so instead - what about you starting a fresh AR topic yourself, Andy, in a non-essay-setting way? Show me how to do it. . . .


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

or is it time to start a New Thread?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Courtesy of Environmental Science, Lancaster

space