Re: Postscript - The Year


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by B Henry on June 29, 2007 at 03:24:48 from 132.181.4.190 user REGY102.

In Reply to: Re: Postscript posted by Jock on June 28, 2007 at 07:06:26:

It is interesting to know that this postscript exists. It is now interesting to know who was responsible (although by what authority or source we still seem to be in the dark - any further info available?).

However what strikes one as interesting is the actual year indicated - 'Kanchenjunga was climbed in 1930'. It seemed to be the case that many people took 1931 as the SD year with SA requiring a bump from 1929 to 1930. This certainly seems to be the case in the excellent time-line presented in the item at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swallows_and_Amazons_%28series%29
So is the postscript contrary to what is generally held?

This time-line is well worth studying in detail as it contains a wealth of information including notes and with 'who' and 'where' being indicated as well as 'when'. Also, it can be clicked to obtain an enlarged version.

There is no indication as to who put the effort in, but I would certainly like to compliment that person.



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

or is it time to start a New Thread?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Courtesy of Environmental Science, Lancaster

space