Posted by Andrew Craig-Bennett on October 03, 2007 at 21:26:18 from 195.93.21.2 user ACB.
In Reply to: Re: A related question - inappropriate position of illustrations in WDMTGTS - 2000 reprint. posted by Jon on October 03, 2007 at 16:22:45:
No, it is not.
That is why I set out "should be at page ..." in each case, showing the correct relationship between text and picture, in view of the layout, rather than referring to the pagination of earlier editions.