Posted by andyb on February 07, 2009 at 08:19:33 user beardbiter.
In Reply to: Re: Four firs that used to be in a wood posted by Mike Field on February 07, 2009 at 07:36:44:
"sorry to be literalist and pedantic" Er... Really? Surely not?
Well of course I'm not, but I'm supposed to say it and you 're supposed to pretend that you hadn't noticed that I'm an incorrigible gloating pedant. I think, AR knew the difference, wasn't Scarab planked with larch? And Swallow's new mast 'Norway pine'?
Over to you Andrew CB
PS Firs and pines are evergreen, larches are not and the conifers in the picture seemed a bit lacking in needles