Posted by Iain Hobbs on 12/21/99 from 194.82.168.3:
In Reply to: Re: Another loss posted by Peter Roche on December 18, 1999 at 14:48:04:
Re "Comments" by Peter Roche, in reply to "Another Loss". I DID NOT INTEND and WAS NOT INTENDING any sort of disrespect to Sir Rupert, as suggested by Peter Roche, and I did not originate the suggestion that He was responsible for the cover up of some of AR's documents. The indication towards AR's executors came from else where and I suppose because Sir Rupert is the most prominent of these people, His name was suggested as prime suspect in the concealment of documents. Untill I met a certain founding memnber of TARS, I was not aware of any such cover up, although I was aware that a large chunk of documents were not with the bulk of other documents, even those not available to the general public. Whoever did conceal the documents would have to have a great deal of influence. According to the version of information given to me on the matter. The story of the concealment of documents has been around ever since TARS was founded. I only said that He was believed to have been responsible. I did not say that he actually was. As to whether Sir Rupert is extant or not. The information about his demise came off TARBOARD and did originate with Me.