Posted by John Nichols on August 04, 2022 at 08:00:30 user Mcneacail.
In Reply to: Re: Dick Callum's astronomy book posted by Adam Quinan on August 02, 2022 at 14:48:38:
Statistically, it would be hard to defeat your reasoning, if this was a breach of copyright case.
I was looking on the old book lists, published 27, 29, and 33 so it was popular, AR could have used 27 or 29 or 33, your conjecture of 27 would be a large point the barrister would raise to frazzle you.
Barristers are not nice people.
Post a followup (Only if you agree to the Terms and Conditions)