Posted by Ian E-N on September 25, 2000 at 09:23:08 from es-electronics.lancs.ac.uk:
In Reply to: Re: Arthur Ransome and Not Arthur Ransome posted by Andy Morley on September 24, 2000 at 23:34:54:
>I think Adam that Ian's messages are slightly mixed because at
>various times he has said that TARS and its politics should be
>confined to the Club Hut, and yet here today he seems inclined
>to launch into a discussion on company law related to that
>very subject
oooo, far from it, merely wished to point out that this is not a matter
to be approached in a childish manner, that there are legal ramifications,
that this should be approached in as civilised as possible a manner, and that
for these reasons this isn't the place to do it.
Other Options :-
My Agenda :- To provide an Arthur Ransome discussion forum.
I will spend some time today removing messages