Re: Donoghue v Stevenson (was Stone Bottle)


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by Andrew Craig-Bennett on January 27, 2003 at 00:18:39 from 195.93.33.13 user ACB.

In Reply to: Re: Donoghue v Stevenson (was Stone Bottle) posted by Dave Thewlis on January 26, 2003 at 00:57:41:


A very bad paraphrase, from memory, thirty years after reading it, would be something like, "Our Lord's commandment, that, "Thou shalt love thy neighbour" becomes, in law, "Thou shalt not injure thy neighbour". The lawyer's question becomes, "Who, then, is my neighbour?" and the the commonsense answer is, "Any person whom I might reasonably have in contemplation as likely to be affected by my actions"".

Peter H please improve and correct!


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Courtesy of Environmental Science, Lancaster

space