Posted by Dave Thewlis on May 18, 2003 at 14:20:48 from 148.78.245.11 user dthewlis.
In Reply to: Re: Regular topics posted by Peter H on May 17, 2003 at 19:55:10:
Now I'm getting concerned about an area of the AR website for what Peter called "FAV" summaries. I still think it's a worthwhile idea, but I presume we ought to be open to more than one "troller" to ensure that nothing worthwhile gets left out. And who decides if the summary really captures the discussion? If person (a) puts together a summary for this purpose and upon reading it, others feel it is insufficient or wrong, then who referees all this?
As soon as we start to try and accommodate such comments or additions, now we're just editing a discussion such as happens on Tarboard all the time, and without the intermediary editing.