Re: Captain Flint's negligence


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by Robert Hill on February 21, 2004 at 00:32:15 from 195.92.168.176 user eclrh.

In Reply to: Re: Captain Flint's negligence posted by Andrew Craig-Bennett on February 19, 2004 at 22:18:39:

"Furthermore, the negligence of the said James Turner in leaving a lighted cigar where a monkey could pick it up and drop it into the petrol tank was clearly an act of the said James Turner as Master and not as Owner so his negligence is still an insured peril."

Might they perhaps have paid out to James Turner as Owner and then sought reimbursement from James Turner as Master?




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Courtesy of Environmental Science, Lancaster

space