Re: Questioning another detail


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by Peter H on January 23, 2005 at 19:51:34 from 81.131.3.167 user Peter_H.

In Reply to: Questioning another detail posted by Robert Dilley on January 23, 2005 at 03:10:03:

Nice Latin, Robert, but uh-oh, I don't think Ed K will approve . . .

This isn't an AR 'error' but it's something which has always puzzled me. In Winter Holiday, why is it that Nancy's message, illustrated in Ch XVII, baffled the children for so long? Wouldn't it have been immediately obvious to them that the gesticulating 'matchstick' people on the far shore were semaphoring? Particularly to Peggy, who would know how Nancy's mind worked? And then isn't it obvious that the message, when spelt out, was written backwards? Surely Dick would have realised that in a flash? Their slowness in this episode seems at odds with their normal quick deduction skills.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Courtesy of Environmental Science, Lancaster

space