Posted by Robert Hill on February 02, 2005 at 19:38:47 from 195.92.168.174 user eclrh.
In Reply to: Re: till posted by Robert Hill on February 02, 2005 at 19:33:46:
When I wrote my previous post I hadn't read David Bamford's post. Chambers and the COD disagree with him too - not about the other meanings of till but about its existence in parallel with until, having the same meaning but not being a contraction of until.