Non-AR topics - was (Re: How was it all paid for?


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by Peter H on March 19, 2006 at 14:02:13 from 81.131.130.116 user Peter_H.

In Reply to: Re: How was it all paid for? posted by Prue Eckett on March 19, 2006 at 05:06:52:

If I were to advocate the following rules for Tarboard, what would people say? Probably - it's that reactionary Peter H at it again- why can't we all have fun?

The rules are:

1) 'Steps will be taken to remove blatantly off topic posts'

2) 'I will consider removing any content that other users might find . . . . very, very annoying'.

Well I'm nothing to do with it - these are already Tarboard rules, set by Ian E-N. And I make no comment, except to point out that the judgment on whether a post is 'very, very annoying' is that of 'other users', not Ian. I suggest that this is something we might all think over carefully . . .


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

or is it time to start a New Thread?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Courtesy of Environmental Science, Lancaster

space