Posted by PeterH on May 21, 2006 at 22:13:52 from 18.104.22.168 user Peter_H.
In Reply to: Re: The Cairn on Kanchenjunga: some musings on an ancient debate posted by Jock on May 21, 2006 at 19:31:01:
This post is made in a genuine spirit. I very much agree with Jock when he laments the dearth of ‘extended essays’ on Tarboard. I think, with respect, that I know one of the reasons for this dearth. It is to do with ‘climate’. To post up an extended essay is hard work, and is also a bit self-revealing. In short, it requires some personal courage, and you leave yourself open to attack, and even mild ridicule. My evidence – Ed Kiser, who has posted up many lengthy and brave expositions of his love for AR, but has occasionally been met with hostile remarks. And I should add that in 'ridicule' I include bursting into a serious thread and switching to a superficial topic. This is really discouraging for the author of the original serious post.
Forgive me, but I can't help remarking on a tendency on Tarboard lately for short posts, dissing one of AR’s characters, or wandering off-topic altogether, or when all else fails, blaming that old whipping-boy, TARS. I, and others, get awfully tetchy when we have to correct laboriously some of the wilder assertions, and this generates a similar reaction. It also leaves us little time to compose ‘extended essays’. The time I took researching to prove that the Dogs Home isn't being mismanaged could have been spent, eg, considering the importance of Peggy in the stories. I think I have made my point. I welcome a climate in which the usual targets were put aside and there was time and safety to post extended positive considerations of AR’s work, of the type Jock wishes to encourage.
Post a Followup