Re: Which bio?


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by PeterH on June 26, 2006 at 10:37:19 from 86.130.132.237 user Peter_H.

In Reply to: Re: Which bio? posted by John Nichols on June 26, 2006 at 02:50:46:

Is that too concise? . . .Did I leave anything important out?

No, John - in fact you left some unimportant stuff in. 'He was conceived, born, lived' is not necessary unless someone is alleging that the books were written by a disembodied spirit. For the same reason 'and he died' is superfluous - we all do.

So I suggest your bio should read 'AR wrote 12 great books and a bit of other stuff, and he moved and sailed a bit.'

My only problem with that is that AR's Russian journalism is contained in 'a bit of other stuff' and I think it was much more important than that - as a formative influence for a start.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

or is it time to start a New Thread?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Courtesy of Environmental Science, Lancaster

space