Re: What's the objective? (was COMMENTS REQUESTED)


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by Owen Roberts on March 29, 2007 at 15:11:46 from 195.92.67.65 user OwenRoberts.

In Reply to: Re: What's the objective? (was COMMENTS REQUESTED) posted by Peter Hyland on March 28, 2007 at 22:01:04:

" Should not one question everything?" writes Peter.
I am not questioning (and I wonder whether anyone else should question either) Mike's right to post any AR relevant topic to TarBoard. But we can (and Mike invited it) comment on the content of the mapping exercise.
If I understood some earlier posts correctly, some posters were questioning the rationale for the maps in the first place. Perhaps if they read S&A again, they would find that John redrew the local guide book to include the S&A names and features.
However when Mike has exhausted all the AR relevant maps, he could turn his abilities to a map of the, by now infamous, Beckfoot plumbing system - then that could keep us occupied for hours!


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

or is it time to start a New Thread?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Courtesy of Environmental Science, Lancaster

space