Posted by Jock on February 02, 2009 at 18:15:18 user Jock.
In Reply to: Re: Volunteers needed! posted by Jock on January 28, 2009 at 21:03:46:
First of all, a huge thank you to all the TarBoarders who took sportingly took part in this experiment.
I’m grateful that so many of you sent in answers without demanding any further rationale for the exercise.
In fact, had I attempted to give any kind of explanation, there would have been a danger of distorting
the results.
Secondly, I must confess to a little piece subterfuge. I did not intend this to be an ‘IQ test’, although
I borrowed the question from just such a test. (I would not dream of trying to test the IQ of TarBoarders!)
What I was interested in was the way people perceived the question and the distribution of the results.
Here are the results:
'L' | 12 | |
'N' | 1 | |
circle | 1 | |
‘L’ + ‘N’ + rectangle | 1 | |
‘L’ + ‘N’ | 1 | |
‘L’ + circle + ellipse | 1 |
So which is the right answer? Hold on a mo and I’ll tell you! But, let me answer another question first.
Why did I post the question? It’s the kind of test that when sitting the '11 plus' exam at the age of 10
would leave me shaking with terror in my desk, because no one answer seemed more ‘right’ than the rest.
Meanwhile my friends had put down their answers and skipped happily on with the rest of test.
I wanted to test a theory: (a) that the majority of those who answered the question would in fact choose
one particular answer; and (b) that there would be a small minority who would share my existential doubts
and see more than one ‘right’ answer. So a hearty thanks to David Gibb, Pamela Adams and Robert Hill
for pointing out that – depending on the rules chosen for the transformation - there could be more than one
answer. You don’t know how much better you have made me feel!
All three have given me permission to quote their answers, so here they are:
(David Gibb)
(Pamela Adams)
The circle and ellipse are arguable answers because they are closed and could be regarded as composed
of two halves, but (a) the halves are not straight and (b) there are no corners to show where we should
regard the halves as meeting.
As far as I’m concerned, all the answers were ‘the right answer’. In fact, with a little bit of ingenuity a logical
case can be made for every single one of the figures in the bottom row. But, what I did find very interesting
was that of the 17 people would took part only three indicated that there could be more than one ‘right’ answer.
Tomorrow - the link with AR.