Re: Sequels


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by Sequels and Speculation on 01/16/00 from 62.136.66.140 via proxy webcache14b.cache.pol.co.uk:

In Reply to: Re: Sequels posted by Robert Dilley on January 15, 2000 at 21:32:21:

As a perpetrator of a private musing (MM vol 2 no 3 p24) I agree with Ian Wright, and practically everybody but Prue in this thread. Speculation is fun, and an inevitable part of the pleasure of the books but attempting to write a sequel is a very different matter, and almost certain to fail when you take into account AR's style and intentions, and all the aspects of the series - and it is a series, not just a succession of books, which ends very satisfactorily, I've always thought with GN. Even AR couldn't manage a sequel.
That said, Prue, put us out of our misery. WHY Nancy and Timothy?It's not obvious to me. I had her paired off with Tom Dudgeon.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]