Posted by Thanks, Chris on December 01, 2000 at 12:45:39 from 203.18.21.200:
In Reply to: Re: And also off-topic.... posted by Chris Hatt on December 01, 2000 at 09:10:49:
So new out here we haven't even seen it yet. However, having viewed the websites whose addresses you posted, it seems pretty clear that we haven't missed a thing.
Can anyone please tell me why the makers of the series, having pinched a good title and the name of a famous fictional character on which to build a completely new pile of their own peculiar brand of slush/soap-opera/junk/what-you-will, should be allowed to get away with it?
And why would the BBC, whose name used to be synonynmous with integrity, be party to the theft?