Posted by Geraint Lewis on August 19, 2016 at 09:19:44 user Geraint_Lewis.
In Reply to: Re: 2016 Film - More Odd Reports posted by Mike Dennis on August 19, 2016 at 05:39:59:
Thanks, Mike. You're quite right that the DM article says "Arthur Ransome Trust". So does the Times one it was taken from, and so does Andrea's original article. My point is that they're factually incorrect. The consultations over Titty's name change certainly took place as described. But for the record they were with AR's Literary Executors, NOT with the Arthur Ransome Trust.
Incidentally, Andrea has published the article she wrote online (link below), so you can read it directly, without the various papers' edits (which are quite significant in places), and without need to climb the Times paywall.
Post a followup (Only if you agree to the Terms and Conditions)