Posted by Peter R on March 01, 2005 at 08:48:28 from 62.64.236.142 user badboy.
In Reply to: Re: Objects posted by Mike Field on March 01, 2005 at 00:39:43:
But to someone who didn't know AR's writings it would be difficult to know what was intended -- which is that those things are to be undertaken in a straightforward, honest, constructive, and no-hidden-agendas fashion.
Thanks Mike.
I believe I know what was intended, that TARS should be run on those terms, I simply wanted a Tar's eye view/interpretation/undertanding of it, for future use, maybe. Does anyone wish to disagree with Mike or post their own interpretation?