Re: Captain Flint's travels - overcooked?


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by PeterH on November 29, 2006 at 20:44:46 from 86.130.139.154 user Peter_H.

In Reply to: Re: Captain Flint's travels - overcooked? posted by Owen Roberts on November 29, 2006 at 19:25:40:

tin hat

Ping! . . . .OK, white flag! Two quick points: yes, of course digging into the characters’ imaginary past is fun, but my, and I suspect David’s, objection was also tongue in cheek. When I see people getting hopelessly tangled in pure speculation, I cannot resist a leg-pull. Nor can one or two others, as witness the suggestion, a few months ago, that the colour of Mr Dixon’s socks should be on our agenda. But no, please, do carry on ! I merely cannot promise that there won’t be an occasional bit of ‘sledging’ . . . ;-)

One other, more serious (well slightly more serious) point. Peter Ceresole says On a board like this, nobody is forced to join in- it's easy to skip past it. Well, that certainly used to be the case some years ago, in fact at one time it was a TarBoard mantra, but I personally feel that it isn’t so easy now to ‘skip past’ anything. Someone recently said that there was a TarBoard ‘community’, and I think he/she was right. Maybe there are less persons regularly taking part, and fewer different threads, but I now find it almost impossible to ignore anything that is going on on TarBoard (and I don’t wish to ignore anything anyway). Perhaps, in the TarBoard Arms, we have all got to know each other a bit. Can’t be bad?




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

or is it time to start a New Thread?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Courtesy of Environmental Science, Lancaster

space