Re: Mine exploration (was Re: Church Beck as the River Amazon?)


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by Jock on October 06, 2005 at 00:29:02 from 84.69.115.112 user Jock.

In Reply to: Re: Mine exploration (was Re: Church Beck as the River Amazon?) posted by andyb on October 05, 2005 at 23:50:43:

I agree, I think (it's getting late). I went through a mental tick list before replying to Dan's question.

  1. Must warn him about the other levels.
  2. Can only tell him that it's relatively safe.
  3. Could his family hold me liable if he has an accident?
  4. Musn't encourage him to go into a mine.

It was worry about (3) that prompted the rather OTT health warning. And it was worry about being OTT that prompted the subsequent post about the fieldguide which will give Dan the necessary information so that he can decide for himself.

Nanny state? It's partly a state of mind, partly the efforts of our rule-loving bureaucrats,* and partly our own fear of being held liable.

* Did you hear the one about the government department that's been set up to ensure that no single department gets more zealous than the others about implementing the Freedom of Information Act?



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

or is it time to start a New Thread?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Courtesy of Environmental Science, Lancaster

space