Re: Books - publishers


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by Prue Eckett on July 10, 2002 at 21:20:41 from 210.54.91.17 user Prue_Eckett.

In Reply to: Re: Books - publishers posted by Peter H on July 10, 2002 at 15:49:00:

'Trial reading groups of children are too unreliable' - there speaks an editor! The wider audience of readers is somehow more reliable?
I find it ludicrous that publishers continue to denigrate their audience in this manner.If they've been tried and failed then its more likely to do with the narrow choice of readers the publisher selected.

Yes,publishing is a matter of backing hunches, and no, there is no such thing as publishing genius, but when readers are dismissed because of variables, then you simply are going back to 'the publisher is right!'
And I could never believe publishing is easy - just as writing isn't the doddle non-writers often think.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Courtesy of Environmental Science, Lancaster

space