Riot Act Re: The 'i' word

Posted by Ian E-N on February 27, 2004 at 18:18:16 from 213.122.165.42 user IanEN.

In Reply to: The 'i' word posted by Laurence Monkhouse on February 27, 2004 at 16:55:45:

AR, who we all venerate, actually brought in an immigrant as his wife, sailing quite close to the legal wind in doing so,

and as for those swallows ...

and he did write for a left of centre newspaper.

so it would be appropriate if anyone wishing to discuss the matters further did so at/on the (Manchester) Guardian's discussion fora.

Crowded UK Prue Eckett 02/27/04 (3)
- Re: Crowded UK Peter H 02/28/04 (2)
  - Re: Crowded UK John Lambert 02/29/04 (1)
    - Re: Crowded UK John Wilson 02/29/04 (0)
Re: Riot Act Re: The 'i' word Peter H 02/27/04 (14)
- Re: Riot Act Re: The 'i' word Ian E-N 03/01/04 (0)
- Jelly references Ed Kiser 02/28/04 (12)
  - Re: Jelly references Peter H 02/28/04 (11)
    - Re: Jelly references Alex Forbes 02/29/04 (5)
      - Re: Jelly references Mike Dennis 02/29/04 (4)
        
        Re: Jelly references - jam session Peter H 02/29/04 (3)
        
        Re: Jelly references - jam session Peter Willis 02/29/04 (1)
        
        Re: Jelly references - jam session Bruce A Clarke 03/01/04 (0)
        
        Re: Jam in tins Robert Dilley 02/29/04 (0)
    - Re: Jelly references Prue Eckett 02/29/04 (4)
      - Re: Jelly references-deceased loganberry Peter H 02/29/04 (3)
        
        Way off the topic - naturally Prue Eckett 02/29/04 (2)
        
        Re: Way off the topic - naturally Peter H 02/29/04 (1)
        
        Re: Way off the topic - naturally Prue Eckett 03/01/04 (0)