Re: Relevance to AR. was Re: Right to Roam?


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by Peter Hyland on April 10, 2007 at 14:27:07 from 86.142.68.88 user Peter_H.

In Reply to: Re: Relevance to AR. was Re: Right to Roam? posted by andyb on April 10, 2007 at 13:44:32:

I wish those who want Ransome, Ransome and nothing but Ransome would get on with providing it instead of moaning about what others choose to post.

Andy - about six months ago, when a similar point was made, I took up the challenge and put forward about six AR topics for discussion. These were things like - 'does the moral framework shown in Ransome's work have any relevance today?' - that sort of thing. Another Tarboarder (no names, no pack drill) responded by dismissing my points with witty one-liners and then concluding with 'now let's get back to plumbing' or some such remark. I am not going to repeat that humiliation. I'm sorry, Andy, if my post has annoyed you - I am merely seeking equal treatment under the TarBoard rules for everyone - is that so terrible?


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

or is it time to start a New Thread?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Courtesy of Environmental Science, Lancaster

space