Re: PD, ML and GN (was Great Northern? Real!)


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by Peter H on August 25, 2008 at 22:06:45 user Peter_H.

In Reply to: Re: PD, ML and GN (was Great Northern? Real!) posted by Jock on August 25, 2008 at 12:26:29:

your extensive (and interesting) textual analysis

It certainly is extensive and interesting. In fact the analysis is brilliantly simple, and when I read it I thought 'why didn't I think of that?' But I am bewildered. Why hasn't Jock being giving us this sort of top-class analysis of AR before? This way of looking at AR, approaching AR, is where it's at. It's what TarBoard is really for, IMO.

More of this, please, Jock, and less of the TarBoard 'patrolling'. Don't waste time shadowing Peter H to pull him up for some slight or other, imagined or otherwise - leave that type of thing to Ian, if he feels it necessary. Instead, I really would be fascinated to learn why you consider GN? to be 'dark'. For years I have wished TarBoard could tackle these deeper issues occasionally. I suggested some once, and you swept them aside. Well done now for tackling the difficult PD/ML/GN problem in such a helpful way. Things just might be looking up at last.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Eel-Mail:

Existing subject (please edit appropriately) :

or is it time to start a New Thread?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

post direct to TarBoard test post first

Before posting it is necessary to be a registered user.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TarBoard ]